HARRY AND MEGHAN HAVE KEPT ARCHIE AND LILIBET’S SCHOOLS SECRET — AND NOW IT HAS EMERGED THAT THE TWO CHILDREN DON’T EVEN ATTEND THE SAME SCHOOL. Meghan confirmed that she has to make a lengthy trip each morning because Archie and Lilibet attend different schools, but she never explained the reason behind the arrangement. Local schools in Montecito have been mentioned as possible options, yet none has been confirmed. In the past, Meghan reacted particularly strongly when imagining what Archie’s school life could look like in Britain. The reason she gave at the time may explain why the Sussexes treat what seems like an ordinary schooling decision as something that must be fiercely protected.

Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet attending different schools might initially sound like an unusual decision. But the most revealing part of their education story may have little to do with why the siblings currently study separately.

Instead, it is what Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have previously said about raising their children in America — and what Meghan believes could happen if their ordinary school routine were transferred to Britain.

Meghan with Archie and Lilibet in the garden

The Sussexes have carefully protected details about their children’s education. They have not publicly identified their schools, and Meghan has not confirmed why Archie and Lilibet attend different institutions. Yet her comments about morning drop-offs, packed lunches and the prospect of British schooling reveal something larger: education is connected to the kind of childhood Harry and Meghan want their children to experience.

According to a Yahoo article, Meghan first confirmed the siblings attend different schools while discussing motherhood on The Jamie Kern Lima Show in April 2025.

Two children, two schools — and one very long morning

Meghan spoke candidly about motherhood during the interview, acknowledging that it can sometimes feel “incredibly overwhelming” and that she can “need a break.”

Her morning routine offered one example.

She revealed that she has a lengthy round trip when dropping Archie and Lilibet off because the children attend separate schools.

The reason remains unknown.

Meghan, Duchess of Sussex in episode 105 of With Love, Meghan. Cr. Courtesy of Netflix © 2024

The article suggests the simplest explanation may be their ages. Archie is now seven, while Lilibet is four, meaning they are at different educational stages. If age is the only reason for the separation, Lilibet could eventually join her brother when she becomes old enough.

But that remains speculation rather than something Meghan has confirmed.

When Meghan cannot handle drop-off herself, the family’s nanny can reportedly take responsibility. The nanny’s identity remains private, although the family is said to have employed the person for six years, dating back to their 2020 move to the United States.

Meghan appears to value the ordinary parts of school life

Perhaps more revealing than where the children study is Meghan’s description of what she enjoys doing for them.

She said:

“I love doing lunch boxes, it makes me very happy and writing a little note in their lunch boxes.”

It is an ordinary parenting detail, but it fits into a much broader theme in how Meghan has previously discussed raising Archie and Lilibet.

She wants to participate.

Prince Archie Harrison tends to a rose in a photo captured by Meghan Markle in their garden

That means making lunches, writing notes and doing school drop-offs — activities that millions of parents consider completely unremarkable.

For the children of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, however, Meghan believes geography could determine whether those ordinary routines remain ordinary.

Her concern about British schooling is not really about the schools

Meghan previously discussed this issue with The Cut.

Interviewer Allison P. Davis recalled Meghan explaining that if Archie attended school in Britain, she believed she would never be able to complete pickup and drop-off without it becoming:

“a royal photo call with a press pen of 40 people snapping pictures.”

Meghan’s response was emphatic:

“Sorry, I have a problem with that.”

She then explained how she viewed the issue:

“That doesn’t make me obsessed with privacy. That makes me a strong and good parent protecting my child.”

That distinction is important.

Nothing in those comments suggests Meghan was criticizing the quality of British education. Her concern was what being educated in Britain could mean for the children’s exposure to media attention.

Prince Harry kissed daughter Lilibet on the head as they sit on a boat

For Meghan, the school gate represents something larger: whether Archie and Lilibet can experience childhood routines without their royal identities transforming those routines into public events.

Harry has also praised their American childhood

It would be easy to frame this as Meghan alone resisting a British future for the children.

But Harry has previously spoken positively about raising them in America too.

He said:

“I very much enjoy living here and bringing up my kids here.”

More significantly, Harry argued that his children can enjoy freedoms in America that they:

“undoubtedly wouldn’t be able to do in the UK.”

That statement suggests the couple have shared at least one important belief about California: it gives Archie and Lilibet access to experiences their father believes would be harder under the intense attention surrounding them in Britain.

Harry understands that contrast particularly personally because his own childhood unfolded inside the Royal Family.

What schools actually are they attending?

Harry and Meghan have chosen not to reveal that information.

That has not stopped speculation about the educational options available around Montecito.

Local resident Richard Mineards previously discussed the subject on HELLO!’s A Right Royal Podcast. He highlighted Cold Spring School, describing it as highly rated and within the family’s catchment area.

“We have very good schools,” he said.

He also mentioned Montecito Union School, calling it “very, very good” and noting that children of “the rich and famous” attend.

Mineards suggested Archie could continue through state education locally or that Harry and Meghan could eventually choose private education.

But none of those possibilities confirms where Archie or Lilibet currently studies.

Their actual schools remain private.

The separate schools may only be temporary

If age explains the current arrangement, the logistical complication Meghan described may eventually disappear.

Lilibet could potentially join Archie at the same institution once she reaches the appropriate stage.

But the larger education question will remain.

As Archie and Lilibet grow older, Harry and Meghan will have to continue deciding how much their royal heritage should shape their childhood.

A British school could potentially connect them more closely to the country where their father grew up. But the comments cited in the article show why California has offered something Harry and Meghan clearly value: ordinary freedom.

This is ultimately about childhood, not school

The most interesting part of the Sussex education story therefore is not that Archie turns one way in the morning while Lilibet goes somewhere else.

That could have a completely ordinary explanation.

The bigger story is Meghan wanting to make lunch boxes, leave handwritten notes and stand at a school gate without believing that 40 cameras could be waiting there.

Harry has similarly described America as providing freedoms his children would not have in Britain.

For most families, choosing a school is primarily about education.

For Harry and Meghan, it also appears connected to a much more unusual calculation: how to give two children born into one of the world’s most famous families a childhood that does not constantly remind them just how famous their family is.

And that may explain why California represents far more than simply where Archie and Lilibet currently go to school.

Related Posts

BOBBY FLAY DIDN’T PROPOSE TO BROOKE WILLIAMSON — BUT THE GIFT HE GAVE HER MADE HER REALIZE SHE WAS TRULY LOVED. Bobby Flay once made many people believe that he would never enter another commitment in the traditional way. But with Brooke Williamson, he quietly prepared something that no one expected. It was not a wedding, and it was not a typical marriage proposal. Instead, it was a thoughtful gesture that revealed a romantic side of Bobby Flay that the public rarely gets to see.

For many people, a diamond ring represents one thing: an engagement and the promise of marriage. But for celebrity chefs Bobby Flay and Brooke Williamson, the meaning…

BOBBY FLAY IS NOT MARRYING BROOKE WILLIAMSON — BUT HE GAVE HER A SENSE OF SECURITY THROUGH A SPECIAL GIFT. After experiencing multiple marriages in the past, Bobby Flay has chosen a completely different path this time. He did not give Brooke a traditional proposal, but he did give her something that carried a deeply meaningful message. From the outside, many people might think that choosing not to have a wedding means there is uncertainty in the relationship. But Bobby Flay’s decision tells a very different story. A special item has become his way of showing his commitment to the woman he considers his life partner. The story behind it is one that cannot be missed…

Bobby Flay and Brooke Williamson have become one of the most talked-about couples in the culinary world, not only because both are accomplished chefs, but because of…

A STRANGE LOVE STORY — BOBBY FLAY AND BROOKE WILLIAMSON MAY NEVER BE ABLE TO GET MARRIED. The two famous chefs are in a relationship that many people admire, sharing their lives, careers, and private moments together. But behind the image of happiness lies a decision that many people still struggle to understand. The reason they have chosen not to walk down the aisle is not because they lack love or commitment… but because of something Bobby Flay changed after the experiences he went through in the past. And that choice is making the public see their relationship in a completely different way.

Bobby Flay is famous around the world for creating unforgettable dishes in some of the most celebrated restaurants, but his life at home reveals a different side…

SH0CKING: The case of Lindsay Clancy, the mother who admitted to 𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕒𝕟𝕘𝕝𝕚𝕟𝕘 her three young children to 𝕕𝕖𝕒𝕥𝕙, had essentially reached a resolution, but an unexpected twist changed everything.

The highly controversial case of Lindsay Clancy, the Massachusetts mother who admitted to killing her three young children, appeared to be nearing a conclusion — until an…

HARRY AND MEGHAN PLAY THEIR FINAL CARD AFTER BEING BLINDSIDED BY BUCKINGHAM PALACE. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle reacted sharply to a statement issued by Buckingham Palace defining them as private citizens with commercial and charitable interests, rather than as working royals. In response, the couple deployed a familiar tactic.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have once again found themselves at the center of a tense public dispute involving Buckingham Palace. After the Palace issued a statement…

Nicola Peltz’s win at the Kinéo Awards, held during the 2026 Venice Film Festival, has sparked a fierce backlash from both the filmmaking community and the general public. The fact that a 31-year-old actress with two decades of experience was honored as a new face has raised serious questions regarding transparency, particularly given the complete absence of her name from the public voting list. Recently, an unusual move by the organizers has further fueled the belief that the award was the result of a behind-the-scenes deal tailored for the billionaire’s daughter.

It was supposed to be a defining career moment for Nicola Peltz. After years of being recognized mainly as Brooklyn Beckham’s wife and the daughter of billionaire…