In a classic self-own for the ages, fired hacker twins Muneeb and Sohaib Akhter accidentally recorded their entire post-termination conversation on Microsoft Teams after forgetting to stop the recording. The one-hour audio captured every detail of their plot to wipe out 96 U.S. government databases, steal sensitive data, and cover their tracks—becoming irrefutable evidence that landed both brothers in federal prison.

Fired hacker twins forget to end Teams recording, capture own crimes

Va. hacker brothers sentenced - The Washington Post

Perhaps you remember Muneeb and Sohaib Akhter, the 34-year-old twin brothers we profiled earlier this week. Although they had the tech chops to commit years of petty crimes (like stealing airline miles), what landed them in truly serious trouble was deleting 96 US government databases in the hour after both were fired last year by the same federal IT contractor, Opexus. (Opexus had just found out that both brothers had previously been in prison for cyberfraud.)

The pair come off less as cybercriminal masterminds than as galumphing galoots—that is to say, a pair of bumbling oafs who thought that asking AI how to cover their tracks was going to keep them out of federal prison.

Virgina brothers arrested for allegedly tampering with government databases

One of the minor mysteries I encountered while writing the piece was that the government had a verbatim transcript of everything the brothers said to each other during their hour-long deletion spree. The two men lived together in Arlington, Virginia, so it made sense that they might be chatting in the same room rather than by text or instant message. But how the heck had the government gotten access to the audio? Supersecret software bugging? Crazy corporate spyware running on their company laptops? FBI agent in the bushes with a microphone?

I couldn’t figure it out, and the answer didn’t appear in any of the court documents I read. But a helpful source today pointed me to the answer. It is contained within a court filing that bears the unpropitious name, “UNITED STATES’ RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO REVOKE THE DETENTION ORDER.”

Co-conspirator in massive hacking scheme flees United States to Malta - The  Malta Independent

This is the kind of title that practically begs you not to read its contents. Yet the file turns out to be fascinating. And it reveals that our galumphing galoots were supersecretly recorded by… themselves.

On accident.

Because they forgot to stop recording the Teams meeting in which they were fired.

You can’t make this stuff up, folks.

Here’s how prosecutors put it:

On February 18, 2025, two human resources (HR) employees of Company-1 [Opexus] scheduled a Microsoft Teams meeting with Sohaib and Muneeb. Sohaib recorded the meeting starting at 4:48pm Eastern Standard Time. The HR personnel left the meeting approximately 2 minutes and 40 seconds into the recording. Apparently unbeknownst to the defendants, the meeting continued recording the next hour of interactions between the brothers.

Fired hacker twins forget to end Teams recording, capture own crimes - Ars  Technica

And what did the pair discuss? Fortunately, this obscure document gives us a much fuller picture. If you’ve ever wondered what it sounds like to be in the room while cybercriminals do their thing, it sounds something like this:

SOHAIB: “Still connected? Still on the VPN?”

SOHAIB: “Delete all their databases?”

MUNEEB: “Eh, they can recover them…backups, I’m pretty sure.”

SOHAIB: “Daily backups?”

MUNEEB: “Yup.”

SOHAIB: “What’s the plan [then]? We gonna take care of severance or are we gonna do something about…” “Should we retort to whatever they send us by saying we need $25,000 each? Hm?”

MUNEEB: “We are doing petty shit now.”

MUNEEB: “I’m going to wipe my computer clean.”

SOHAIB: “I can’t access the system but I still have the email address for their customers for eCase and FOIAXpress.”

MUNEEB and SOHAIB discuss being compensated by Company-1.

MUNEEB: “I’m not gonna threaten them shit, that’s like could be shown as some sort of . . .”

SOHAIB: “It depends on how you write it. Just say, ‘according to our previous agreement, this is the tally of the amount that I’ve been [paid], if you pay it up front, then I have no reason to communicate with customers.’”

MUNEEB: “I’m good.”

SOHAIB: “Whatcha working on man?”

MUNEEB: “Nothing important, man.”

SOHAIB: “Why won’t you tell me? I ain’t gonna snitch.”

MUNEEB: “Don’t need to. Don’t worry about it.”

MUNEEB: “People are logged out for the day, this is the perfect time.”

SOHAIB: “How do you still have access? When did you connect to their VPN?”

MUNEEB: “10 minutes before their stupid meeting.”

SOHAIB: “You might still have access to it until the end of the day. Until at least 6 hours.”

MUNEEB: “Don’t worry about it man. Don’t worry about it.”

SOHAIB: “I see you are cleaning out their database backups.”

MUNEEB: “Don’t worry about it. You don’t do nothing. Don’t try nothin’. They are looking at you, they are not looking at me.”

SOHAIB: “[G]oing to RDP into their systems and delete all their data.”

[inaudible]

SOHAIB: “The ramifications for that would be worse though.”

MUNEEB: “What are you talking about? I didn’t do nothing. They closed my access when they had that meeting.”

SOHAIB: “Alright, if you have good plausible deniability.”

SOHAIB and MUNEEB then have additional discussion about deleting backups and changing DNS information.

MUNEEB: “Eh, they can recover from yesterday. [The IT manager] will have some work to do.”

MUNEEB and SOHAIB discuss Company-1 customers, including Veteran’s Affairs OIG, Education Department OIG, DHS OIG, and customer data.

MUNEEB: “DHS was a big [customer].”

SOHAIB: “Just go into each of them and start the delete process. It will take its time. . . It will eventually delete all their files.”

MUNEEB: “Sabes, don’t say nothin’, OK, don’t worry about it.”

SOHAIB: “I ain’t sayin’ shit.”

SOHAIB: “You should have thought about it prior, man.”

MUNEEB: “What do you mean? Like had a kill script, what do you mean?”

SOHAIB: “Blackmailing them in for some money would’ve been…”

MUNEEB: “No, you do not do that. That’s proof of guilt, man.”

SOHAIB: “No but the thing was you always have your opinion, I could just communicate with their customers.”

MUNEEB: “Communicate with their customers is a different thing!”

SOHAIB: “So you’re saying these are two separate things?”

MUNEEB: “There ya go. Go say that man, go argue for that, then they’ll think you’re the one behind this shit.”

SOHAIB: “. . . They’re gonna probably raid this place.”

MUNEEB: “Eh, I’ll clean this shit up. I don’t got shit.”

SOHAIB: “We also gotta clean stuff up from the other house man.”

MUNEEB: “Get rid of that shit.”

SOHAIB: “Deleting their filesystems would be a harder fix.”

MUNEEB: “Mhhmm, especially if you clear it out.”

MUNEEB: “Everything that I did, I’m making sure it’s protected. That it’s clean.”

MUNEEB: “Don’t worry, we’ll go to Texas.”

Neither brother is currently in Texas; both are in federal prison. Sohaib was found guilty at trial last week, while Muneeb pleaded guilty in April 2026—but has been furiously trying to take back his plea ever since through a series of handwritten letters to the judge.

Related Posts

LATEST UPDATE UNCOVERS THE DISTURBING ALLEGATIONS SURROUNDING 𝑇𝐻𝐸 15-𝑌𝐸𝐴𝑅-𝑂𝐿𝐷 𝐺𝐼𝑅𝐿 — THE ONLY DEFENDANT IN THE 𝑆𝐻𝐸𝐹𝐹𝐼𝐸𝐿𝐷 𝐵𝐴𝐵𝑌 𝐷𝐸𝐴𝑇𝐻 𝐶𝐴𝑆𝐸 WHOSE NAME REMAINS PROTECTED DUE TO HER AGE. WHAT INVESTIGATORS SAY EMERGED FROM THE HEARING HAS LEFT MANY PEOPLE DEEPLY SHOCKED! The case began after South Yorkshire Police received an urgent call early one Sunday morning regarding concerns for the 𝑤𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑏𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝑛𝑒𝑤𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑛 𝑏𝑎𝑏𝑦 𝑔𝑖𝑟𝑙. Officers immediately attended the address and discovered 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝑎 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒, 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑏 𝑖𝑛𝑗𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠. Despite the rapid response and attempts by emergency crews and police officers to 𝑠𝑎𝑣𝑒 ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑒, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑏𝑦 — 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑦 𝑎𝑢𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝐵𝑎𝑏𝑦 𝑆 — 𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑙𝑦 𝑑𝑖𝑒𝑑 𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑒. As the investigation continued, prosecutors on September 2, 2026, charged four adults — Andrea Skopova, Peter Horvath Jr, Peter Horvath Sr, and Nina Horvathova — over allegations connected 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑏𝑦’𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑡ℎ 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑑 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑎𝑙 𝑤ℎ𝑎𝑡 ℎ𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑑. 𝐴 15-𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟-𝑜𝑙𝑑 girl was also charged with allegedly attempting to obstruct the course of justice, but further details revealed during the court proceedings brought even more attention to the case. Reports from the initial hearing at Sheffield Magistrates’ Court stated that the 𝘵𝘦𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘳 was accused of a series of actions that investigators described as deeply concerning.

As the United Kingdom continues to reel from the horrifying murder of a newborn infant in South Yorkshire, sensational court details have emerged exposing the chilling role…

THE COURT DENIED BAIL FOR 𝑇𝐻𝐸 15-𝑌𝐸𝐴𝑅-𝑂𝐿𝐷 𝐺𝐼𝑅𝐿 AFTER HEARING THE SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS SURROUNDING HER POSSIBLE INVOLVEMENT IN THE CASE. Four adults and a 𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑔𝑒 girl, all reportedly Slovak nationals, have been charged following the discovery 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝑛𝑒𝑤𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑛 𝑏𝑎𝑏𝑦’𝑠 𝑏𝑜𝑑𝑦 inside a property in Sheffield. Authorities said South Yorkshire Police were called to a home on Holywell Heights at around 5 a.m. after receiving an emergency report. Officers arrived at 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑓𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑤𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑛 𝑖𝑛 𝑎 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑠𝑢𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑏 𝑖𝑛𝑗𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠. Emergency responders attempted to 𝑠𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑏𝑦, 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑠, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑤𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑑 𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛. Police first detained seven individuals, ranging in age from 15 to 38, while investigating the suspected 𝑚𝑢𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑟. Two women, aged 26 and 37, were later granted bail. However, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 15-𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟-𝑜𝑙𝑑 𝑔𝑖𝑟𝑙 was refused release and was charged in connection with the case. Her legal representative requested that the court reconsider the bail decision. However, after prosecutors presented details about her alleged actions at the scene, the court declined the request…

As the United Kingdom continues to reel from the horrifying murder of a newborn infant in South Yorkshire, sensational court details have emerged exposing the chilling role…

UNLIKE ANDI’S STATEMENT, MIRIAM’S EXPLANATION IMMEDIATELY SPARKED A WAVE OF OUTRAGE! After facing intense criticism for days, Miriam Margolyes finally spoke out about the backlash following the “racism controversy” with Andi Peters on ITV’s This Morning. The outspoken 85-year-old actress used an offensive word to describe ITV presenter Andi’s skin color during her appearance on the show on Thursday. The controversy became so significant that ITV executives reportedly requested the footage be deleted immediately. While Andi spoke publicly about the incident and was praised by fans and experts, Miriam waited until the criticism reached its highest point before revealing THIS… but sadly, it backfired.

Miriam Margolyes has spoken publicly about the controversy surrounding her recent appearance on ITV’s This Morning, saying she never intended to embarrass or cause harm to presenter…

A SURPRISE ROMANTIC MOVE FROM TV PRESENTER COLEEN NOLAN’S BOYFRIEND, WHO IS 20 YEARS HER JUNIOR, AND HER DAUGHTER’S REACTION TO THE IDEA OF ​​HER MARRYING AGAIN. After a disappointing stint on the dating show “Celebs Go Dating”, Coleen found love through an Instagram DM from Ryan back in May. Despite the significant age gap and the rapid pace of their relationship, which even included getting matching tattoos, Coleen insists she has found the one and is ready to tie the knot for the third time. Her daughter, Ciara, had an unexpected reaction upon hearing that her mother was planning to marry again.

Coleen Nolan has revealed the unexpected way her romance with boyfriend Ryan Brockbank began, admitting that the 41-year-old fashion lecturer was the one who made the first…

Following their separation, TV presenter Cat Deeley and Patrick Kielty have revealed how she and her ex-husband share the responsibility of raising their children. Instead of conflict or contention, they employ a special formula to ensure their children enjoy the best possible life.

Cat Deeley and Patrick Kielty have revealed how they are handling life after their separation, with both choosing to focus on one important priority: giving their children…

THE SPECIAL REASON WHY STACEY CANNOT REVEAL PHOTOS OF THE EXTERIOR OF HER NEW HOME. TV presenter Stacey Solomon and her husband, Joe Swash, have officially left “Pickle Cottage”, the Tudor-style home in Essex they had called their own since 2021. Although they dearly loved the property, which held memories of their wedding and the births of their two daughters, they decided to move to a new home further away to gain the space needed to grow vegetables and rescue more animals. However, Stacey has shared that, for a special reason, she will not be revealing photos of the house’s exterior.

Stacey Solomon has opened up about the reason she will not be sharing photos of the exterior of her new family home after leaving the beloved Pickle…